NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

WPSB/133/2020 of PRAVEEN KUMAR RAI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Decision date
2020-10-27
Case number
133 of 2020

Parties

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Conclusion

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (S/B) No.133 of 2020

Praveen Kumar Rai

……… Petitioner.

State of Uttarakhand and others .…….. Respondents.

thDated: 26June, 2020

Mr. Anl Kumar Joshi, learned Counsel for the petitioner. Mr. K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Mr. Suyash Pant Chaudhary, learned Brief Holder for the State. Mr. D. S. Patni, learned Sr. Counsel assisted by Mr. B.S. Bisht, learned for respondent nos. 2 to 5.

Coram: Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.

Hon’ble Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J. (Oral)

After arguing for some time, Mr. Anil Kumar Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the petitioner has the remedy of approaching the Public Services Tribunal; and the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach the Public Services Tribunal.

2. Granting liberty as sought for, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

(R.C. Khulbe, J.) (Ramesh Ranganathan, C.J.)Balwant/Sukhbant