BA1/2788/2021 of ANITA BHATT Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Court: Uttarakhand High Court
Decision date: 2021-12-29
Case number: 2788 of 2021

Parties

BA1/2788/2021 of ANITA BHATT (PETITIONER)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU & ORS. versus BADRINATH & ORS. (1988)

Statutes cited (2)

constitution of india, article-226 (1950)
constitution of india (1950)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

|**SL.** **No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,** **reports, orders or** **proceedings or** **directions and** **Registrar’s order** **with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||BA1 No.2788 of 2021 and 2792of 2021 **Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.** Mr. DCS Rawat, learned counsel for the applicant. Ms. Meena Bisht, learned B.H. for the State. Accused–Anita Bhatt has sought her release on bail in connection with Case Crime/FIR No.24/2021 and 25/2021, u/s 409/418/420 IPC, registered at P.S. New Tehri, Distt. Tehri Garhwal. It is argued by learned counsel that the accused has been falsely implicated; she is languishing in jail since 003.10.2021; earlier, an FIR no.22 of 2020 was lodged u/s 409/420 IPC regarding the same set of allegations with P.S. New Tehri, Distt. Tehri Garhwal, wherein, the bail had been granted by the Court on 10.5.2021; one of the sureties has submitted another report before the same police station on the same set of allegations and thus, the present FIRs was also lodged against the applicant; since the accused has already been granted bail in the connected case, she deserves bail in these cases also. Per contra, learned counsel for the State opposed for bail but admitted that allegations are same in both the matters. Inasmuch as the accused has already been granted bail in FIR/Crime no.20 of 2020 u/s 409/420 IPC vide order dated 10.5.2021, the allegations in the present FIR are also similar in nature regarding the same transaction, accordingly, without making any comment on the merits, applicant deserves bail in these matters as well. The bail applications are thus, allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail in relationg to both the FIRs on her executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of. **(R.C. Khulbe, J.)** **03.12.2021** Rdang|