C24/14/2021 of BEENA TIWARI PANDEY Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Court: Uttarakhand High Court
Decision date: 2021-10-04
Case number: 795 of 2020

Parties

sl. NoDateOffice Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with SignaturesCOURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS (PETITIONER)
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND (RESPONDENT)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

|**sl. No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,** **reports, orders or** **proceedings or** **directions and** **Registrar’s order** **with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||C24 No.14 of 2021 **Hon’ble Sh ar ad Ku m ar Sh ar m a, J.** Mr. M.K. Ray, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State of Uttarakhand. Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate, for the respondent. The matter is taken up in the revised call. Both the Counsels are present. This is the Transfer Application which has been preferred by the defendant/wife, under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure code, and it has been stated by the counsel for the applicant that as per the information received by him from the respondent counsel that the proceedings of the Original Case No.795 of 2020, “Sri Naveen Vs. Smt. Beena”, under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which was instituted before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun, has already been culminated, and decided on merits In view of the aforesaid statement, that this Transfer Application has been rendered infructuous. The same is accordingly dismissed as having rendered infructuous. **( Sh ar ad Ku m ar Sh ar m a, J.)** 04.10.2021 NR/|