WPMS/146/2022 of SONIKA Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Parties
- Dr. Sonika (PETITIONER)
- State of Uttarakhand and others (RESPONDENT)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition (M/S) No.146 of 2022
Dr. Sonika
...…………. Petitioner
versus
State of Uttarakhand and others
...…………. Respondents
Mr. Vinay Kumar, counsel for the writ applicant-petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
-----------
Order dated: 14.01.2022
Hon’ble S.K.Mishra, ACJ.
1.. The matter is taken up virtuallyThe matter is taken up virtually
2.Heard Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned Counsel for the writ applicant and Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State. writ applicant and Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
3.In this case, the petitioner has prayed the following reliefs: following reliefs:
“(A) Issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to take decision on the representation dated 27.12.2021(annexure-5) to the writ petition, whereby the petitioner has requested for permitting her to deposit the bond amount along with the interest in time bound manner as the NEET PG Counelling-2021 is scheduled to be held from 17[th]January, 2020.
(b) Issue any suitable writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
(c) Award the cost of writ petition to the petitioner.”
4.Learned counsel for the petitioner confined his prayer only to the extent that the petitioner’s representation dated 27.12.2021 (Annexure-5) may be directed to be disposed of. prayer only to the extent that the petitioner’s representation dated 27.12.2021 (Annexure-5) may be directed to be disposed of.
5.In that view of the matter, the writ application is disposed of directing the respondent no. 1 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 27.12.2021 (Annexure No. 5) within period of 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this Order before him. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner shall produce downloaded copy of this Order from the High Court website with an endorsement of correctness by Mr. Vinay Kumar, within 7 days along with copy of the writ application. disposed of directing the respondent no. 1 to take decision on the representation of the petitioner dated 27.12.2021 (Annexure No. 5) within period of 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this Order before him. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that the petitioner shall produce downloaded copy of this Order from the High Court website with an endorsement of correctness by Mr. Vinay Kumar, within 7 days along with copy of the writ application.
6.Learned Standing Counsel shall also intimate about this order to the authorities concerned. about this order to the authorities concerned.
(S.K.Mishra, ACJ)