BA1/1751/2022 of MONU Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Parties
- Monu (PETITIONER)
- Km. Meenu, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, Brief Holder for the State (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 1751 of 2022
Monu
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:-
Km. Meenu, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Monu is in judicial custody in FIR No.242 of 2022, under Section 8/20/60 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (“the Act”), Police Station Ramnagar, District- Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. According to the FIR, on 02.07.2022, 6.300 Kg Ganja was allegedly recovered from the applicant, who was pillion rider in motorcycle driven by the co-accused.
4. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that it is false recovery; there is no FSL report; the provisions of the Act have not been complied with; the
alleged recovered quantity does not belong to the applicant; it is less than commercial; the applicant has no criminal history.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Ravi Bisht
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 03.08.2022