NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

WPSS/184/2022 of SAMPURANAND BHATT Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Decision date
2022-09-30
Case number
184 of 2022

Parties

Statutes cited (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders or**<br>**proceedings or**<br>**directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||WPSS No.184 of 2022<br>**Hon’ble R.C. Khulbe, J.**<br>Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, learned counsel for the<br>petitioners.<br>Mr. Yogesh Pandey, learned Addl. C.S.C. for<br>the State/ respondents.<br>After some length of arguments, learned<br>counsel for the petitioners confined his prayer that a<br>direction may be issued to the respondent-authority<br>to decide the representation of the petitioner within<br>a period of eight weeks.<br>Accordingly, the instant writ-petition is<br>disposed of at the admission stage with the direction<br>that, if the petitioner moves fresh representation<br>within period of 15 days from today, the<br>respondent authority will decide the same within a<br>period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of the<br>representation, as per law.<br>Pending application, if any, also stands<br>disposed of.<br>**(R.C. Khulbe, J.)**<br> Vacation Judge<br>25.01.2022<br>Sukhbant|