WPMS/471/2022 of KARGIL SHAHEED GOVIND SINGH RANA JEEP TAXI OWNERS WELFARE COMMITTEE GUPTKASHI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes, reports,**<br>**orders or proceedings**<br>**or directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order with**<br>**Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||WPMS No. 471 of 2022<br>**Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.**<br>Mr. Mahavir Prasad Kohli, Advocate<br>for the petitioner.<br>Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tewari, Standing<br>Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.<br>Heard<br>learned<br>counsel<br>for<br>the<br>parties.<br>Petitioner is defendant in Original<br>Suit No. 39 of 2020 filed by respondent<br>no.<br>6.<br>The<br>Temporary<br>Injunction<br>Application filed by respondent no. 6 with<br>his suit was rejected by learned trial Court,<br>however, in Appeal under order 43 Rule<br>1(r) CPC, learned First Appellate Court has<br>passed an order on 25.06.2021 directing<br>the parties to maintain status quo,_qua_the<br>suit property. Thus, feeling aggrieved,<br>petitioner has filed this writ petition,<br>challenging order passed by First Appellate<br>Court.<br>I have perused the order impugned<br>dated 25.06.2021. Learned First Appellate<br>Court has considered the matter in great<br>detail and has recorded findings on_prima_<br>_facie_case, balance of convenience and<br>irreparable loss.|

|Thus, this Court does not find any<br>reason to interfere with the impugned|
|---|
|order. Even otherwise also, grant of|
|temporary<br>injunction<br>is<br>discretionary.|
|Learned<br>First<br>Appellate<br>Court<br>has|
|exercised its discretion in proper manner|
|after<br>considering<br>relevant<br>aspects,|
|therefore,<br>interference<br>with<br>such|
|discretionary order while exercising power|
|under Article, 227 of the Constitution|
|would be unwarranted.<br>Accordingly, writ petition fails and is<br>dismissed. No order as to costs.|
|<br>**( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)**<br> 11.03.2022 <br>Navin|