BA1/498/2022 of HASEEN Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Parties
- Haseen (PETITIONER)
- Mr. V.K. Jemini, D.A.G. assisted by Ms. Meena Bisht, Brief Holder for the State (RESPONDENT)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 498 of 2022
Haseen
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Sachin, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. V.K. Jemini, D.A.G. assisted by Ms. Meena Bisht, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Haseen is in judicial custody in FIR No.0412 of 2021, under Section 29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station Banbhulpura, District Nainital. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. According to the FIR, on 24.11.2021, three accused were arrested and smack was recovered from their possession. It was 8.4 gram, 6.7 gram & 6.3 gram respectively. It is those arrested accused, who revealed that they brought smack from the applicant.
4. It is argued that the persons from whose possession the smack was recovered have already been granted bail; the applicant is not previous convict.
5. This is not disputed by learned State Counsel.
6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7. The bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Ravi Bisht
(Ravindra Maithani, J.) 28.06.2022