NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

WPCRL/30/2023 of MOHAN LAL NAUTIYAL Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEHRADUN

Court
Uttarakhand High Court
Decision date
2023-11-09
Case number
30 of 2023

Parties

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports, orders or**<br>**proceedings or**<br>**directions and**<br>**Registrar’s order**<br>**with Signatures**||**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|||||WPCRL No.30 of 2023<br>**Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.**<br>Mr.<br>Devendra<br>Singh,<br>Advocate<br>holding brief of Mr. Raj Kumar Singh,<br>Advocate for the petitioner.<br>Mr, Lalit Miglani A.G.A. for the State.<br>Ms. Neeti Rana and Ms. Akleema<br>Praveen, Advocates for the respondent<br>no.3.<br>The challenge in this petition is<br>made to FIR No. 569 of 2022, dated<br>27.12.2022, under Sections 376, 504 IPC<br>and Section 3(1)r of the Scheduled Castes<br>and<br>Scheduled<br>Tribes<br>(Prevention<br>of<br>Atrocities) Act, 1989, Police Station Raipur,<br>District Dehradun.<br>At the very outset, learned State<br>Counsel gives statement that charge sheet<br>has already been filed.<br>The<br>Court<br>takes<br>on<br>record<br>the<br>statement given by learned State Counsel.<br>The challenge is made to the FIR, but<br>a statement is given that chargesheet has<br>already been filed in the matter. Therefore,<br>nothing survives in this petition. It stands<br>disposed of accordingly. <br>Pending applications stand disposed<br>of, accordingly.<br>**(Ravindra Maithani J.)** <br>23.06.2023<br>RV||