ABA/107/2023 of MOHD INAM Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

Court: Uttarakhand High Court
Decision date: 2024-07-22
Case number: 107 of 2023

Parties

Mohd. Inam and another … (PETITIONER)
Mr. V.S. Rawat, AGA for the State (RESPONDENT)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Anticipatory Bail Application No.107 of 2023

Mohd. Inam and another ….....Applicants

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent

Present:-

Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the applicant.

Mr. V.S. Rawat, AGA for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Applicants seek anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.100 of 2023, under Sections 5/11 of Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007, Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. According to the FIR, on 24.02.2023, police recovered beef from place, but the applicant along with co-accused managed to escape.

4. State was required to file objections, but it has yet not been filed.

5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that this is case fit for anticipatory bail.

6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

7. In the eventuality of arrest, the applicants shall

be enlarged on anticipatory bail subject to their furnishing personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the applicants shall also comply with the following conditions:

(i) The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation. investigation.

(ii) The applicants shall not approach any witness, whatsoever. whatsoever.

(iii) The applicants shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court. without prior permission of the concerned court.

(iv) The applicants shall deposit their passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicants do not have passport, they shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO. the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case the applicants do not have passport, they shall give an undertaking to that effect to the AO.

(v) The applicants shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above. on (i), (ii) & (iii) above.

Ravi

(Ravindra Maithani, J) 22.07.2024