BA1/422/2024 of SHAKIB Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Parties
- Shakib (PETITIONER)
- State of Uttarakhand (RESPONDENT)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
First Bail Application No. 422 of 2024
Shakib
...Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ...Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Mrs. Manisha Rana Singh, AGA for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Shakib is in judicial custody in FIR/Case Crime No. 457/2023, under Sections 328, 342, 323, 370 (1)(2), 506, 120-B IPC, and Section 5/6 of Prevention of The Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956, P.S. Gangnahar Roorkee, District Haridwar. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the victim has not supported the prosecution case at trial; co-accused has been similar role has been granted bail.
4. These facts are not disputed by learned State Counsel.
5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Court concerned.
Nahid/
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)02.04.2024