WPSB/242/2021 of ARUN NEGI Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

|**SL.**<br>**No**|**Date**|**Office Notes,**<br>**reports,**<br>**orders or**<br>**proceedings**<br>**or directions**<br>**and**<br>**Registrar’s**<br>**order with**<br>**Signatures**|**COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS**|
|---|---|---|---|
||||MCC No.4 of 2025 (Review Application)<br>In<br>WPSB No.242 of 2021<br>With<br>MCC No.5 of 2025 (Review Application)<br>In<br>WPSB No.241 of 2021<br>With<br>MCC No.4 of 2025 (Review Application)<br>In<br>WPSB No.245 of 2021<br>**Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J**<br> <br>**Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.**<br>Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel for the petitioners through<br>VC.<br>2.<br>Mr. Sushil Vashistha, learned Standing Counsel for the<br>State.<br>3.<br>Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned counsel for the respondent<br>nos.2 to 4.<br>4.<br>Mr. Yogesh Kumar Pacholia, learned counsel for the<br>respondent no.4.<br>5.<br>Mr. Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel for the respondent<br>no.6.<br>6.<br>These writ petitions were decided by this Court vide<br>judgment dated 07.05.2025 with direction to the competent<br>authority to take decision upon the petitioners’ representation<br>within period of four months.<br>7.<br>Mr. M.C. Pant, learned counsel appearing for the review<br>applicant submits that competent authority has already taken a|

||||decision not to grant the benefits of increment. He further submits<br>that the order sought to be reviewed will come in the way of<br>petitioners for filing fresh writ petition.<br>8.<br>Having regard to the facts of the case, the review<br>applications are disposed of with the observation that the review<br>applicants shall not be precluded from filing another writ petition,<br>simply for the reason that earlier also they had filed the writ<br>petitions seeking similar benefits.<br>**(Ashish Naithani, J)**<br>**(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)**<br>15.09.2025<br>NR/Akash|
|---|---|---|---|