BA1/574/2025 of VINEET SINGH Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Parties
- Vineet Singh (PETITIONER)
- Mr. Dinesh Chandra Dimri, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State (RESPONDENT)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITALFirst Bail Application No.574 of 2025
Vineet Singh
.....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Dinesh Chandra Dimri, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant Vineet Singh is in judicial custody in Case Crime/FIR No.142 of 2024, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC, Section 3 of Uttarakhand Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 2005, Section3/21(3) & 4/22 of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019, Police Station Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. He has sought his release on bail.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the named co-accused Pragya Rawat having similar role has already been granted bail. The informant has entered into compromise with the head of the Uttarakhand Loni Urban Multi-State Credit & Thrift Cooperative Society.
4. It is submitted that co-accused Urmila Bisht and Jagmohan Singh Bisht, both have already been granted bail by this Court. Therefore, it is fit case for bail.
5. This fact is admitted by the learned State Counsel.
6. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
7. The bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
Ravi
(Ravindra Maithani, J) 30.06.2025