BAIL APPLN./1441/2011 of HEERA LAL Vs STATE

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2011-10-17
Case number: 1329 of 2011

Parties

SUNDER (PETITIONER)
STATE (RESPONDENT)

Cited by (1)

Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.

CRL.A./947/2013 of LAJPAT RAI VERMA Vs MUKESH CHAND & ANR. (2016)

Cites (1)

BAIL APPLN./442/2017 of MAHENDER SINGH Vs STATE (2017)

Statutes cited (1)

indian penal code (1860)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLICATION NO.1329/2011

BAIL APPLICATION NO.1441/2011

Date of Decision : 17.10.2011

BAIL APPLN. 1329/2011

SUNDER ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.I.V.Raghav, Adv.

versus

STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Sherwal, Adv. for the complainant.

BAIL APPLN. 1441/2011

HEERA LAL

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. I.V.Raghav, Adv.

versus

STATE ..... Respondent

Through: Mr.Navin Sharma, Adv. Mr.Rakesh Sherwal, Adv. for the complainant.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. SHALI

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?

Bail Appl.Nos.1329 & 1441/2011 Page 1 of 3

2. To be referred to the Reporter or not ? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? NO 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? NO

V.K. SHALI, J.(Oral)

1.These are two bail applications filed by Sunder and Heera

Lal for grant of anticipatory bail in respect of FIR no.96/2011, u/S 420/34 IPC registered by P.S. Neb no.96/2011, u/S 420/34 IPC registered by P.S. Neb

Sarai.

2.The allegations against Heera Lal are that he had cheated the complainant of `20 lacs by inducing him to part with substantial amount of money on account of sale of property situated at Village Khan Pur bearing No.22, Mehrauli measuring 300 sq. yds. Out of the aforesaid amount, receipt for sum of `2,50,000/- is purported to have been shown on account of loan being taken by the accused persons from the complainant. the complainant of `20 lacs by inducing him to part with substantial amount of money on account of sale of property situated at Village Khan Pur bearing No.22, Mehrauli measuring 300 sq. yds. Out of the aforesaid amount, receipt for sum of `2,50,000/- is purported to have been shown on account of loan being taken by the accused persons from the complainant.

3.It has also been alleged by the complainant that after agreeing to sell the property in question to the complainant, the petitioner Heera Lal along with the other co-owner entered into an agreement to sell the agreeing to sell the property in question to the complainant, the petitioner Heera Lal along with the other co-owner entered into an agreement to sell the

Bail Appl.Nos.1329 & 1441/2011 Page 2 of 3

property in question to some third party for total sale consideration of `8,80,00,000/-.

4.The allegations against the petitioners are very serious in nature. The accused Sunder and his son is shown to be witness in these transactions. Both the son and the father seem to be repeatedly filing applications for insulating their liberty. I feel that keeping in view the allegations which are very serious in nature, both the son and the father do not deserve to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications are dismissed

OCTOBER 17, 2011 RN

V.K. SHALI, J.

Bail Appl.Nos.1329 & 1441/2011 Page 3 of 3