W.P.(CRL)/1468/2015 of SURENDER KUMAR Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Parties
- +W.P.(CRL) 1468/2015SURENDER KUMAR (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+W.P.(CRL) 1468/2015SURENDER KUMAR..... PetitionerSURENDER KUMAR..... Petitioner
ThroughMr. Ashim Shridhar & Ms.ShrutiKukreja, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
..... Respondents
ThroughMr. Ashish Aggarwal, ASCSI Rizwan Khan PS Seelampur.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMARO R R%07.08.2015
The prayer of the petitioner for release on parole on medical grounds wasrejected by the competent authority on 30.06.2015.
The petitioner had been released on parole from 30.12.2014 to 28.01.2015.The prayer for release was made within period of six months from the lastparole period.This was the reason for the rejection of the prayer of thepetitioner.
The petitioner has brought on record medical papers of Lok Nayak Hospital,Delhi, reveal kidney trouble and suggestion of renal transplantation atAIIMS.
The status report confirms the medical condition of the petitioner.
However, it has been stated on behalf of the State that medical facilities arealso available at Tihar Jail.
Considering the emergent situation wherein the petitioner is to get his
kidney transplanted, let the petitioner be released on parole for period of30 days from the date of his release on his furnishing bond in the sum ofRs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, one such surety to be thebrother of the wife of the petitioner, to the satisfaction of the Trial court .After release on parole, the petitioner would ensure his admission in anyhospital, if not at AIIMS where such facility is available so that he could betreated for his renal trouble. After his admission in the hospital, he wouldobtain certificate from the Superintendent of the concerned hospital andwould have it furnished to the SHO of the concerned police station. In casethe transplantation is not done for some reason or the other including lack ofpermission or absence of wherewithal in that particular hospital, that factalso would be immediately communicated to the SHO of the concernedpolice station.
The petitioner would surrender before the jail authorities on or before theexpiry of the period of parole.
With these observations, the petition is disposed of.
copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of theconcerned Jail for information and compliance.Dasti.
AUGUST 07, 2015ab
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J