CRL.REV.P./313/2015 of VIJAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER Vs STATE
Parties
- VIJAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER (PETITIONER)
- STATE (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (1)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+CRL.REV.P. 313/2015 & Crl.M.A. No.7823/2015
VIJAY KUMAR AND ANOTHER
..... Petitioners
ThroughMr.Raj Kumar Solanki, Adv.
versus
STATE
..... RespondentThroughMr.Mukesh Kumar, APP for the Statewith SI Sandeep, PS Rohini South.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
O R R%18.02.2016
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since thepetitioners have already been acquitted by the Trial Court, the presentpetition has become infructuous.
Consequently,thepresentpetitionandapplicationaredismissed as rendered infructuous.
FEBRUARY 18, 2016
P.S.TEJI, J