BAIL APPLN./1456/2017 of SHAN MOHD Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI
Parties
- Advs (PETITIONER)
- STATE NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (214)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 1456/2017
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI..... RespondentThroughMr. Amit Gupta, APP
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%19.09.2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in JudicialCustody for more than two years. Complainant has already been examined.The complainant’s testimony has been shattered in his cross-examination.Injured was discharged from the hospital on the same day.
Learned APP has opposed this bail application. It is contended thatcomplainant has mentioned the name of petitioner in the FIR.Thecomplainant had stated in the FIR that petitioner had taken out pistol andfired at him. The complainant sustained injuries in his hand. Complainanthad identified the petitioner in his examination in chief but had subsequentlyturned hostile in his cross-examination with regard to his identity.
Keeping in mind the totality of the facts and circumstances of thiscase, petitioner is admitted to bail, subject to his furnishing personal bondin the sum of `20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with one surety in
the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court.
Bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
A.K. PATHAK, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2017RB