W.P.(CRL)/3030/2017 of ARCHANA SAXENA Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS
Parties
- + W.P.(CRL) 3030/2017 ARCHANA SAXENA (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+W.P.(CRL) 3030/2017ARCHANA SAXENA..... PetitionerARCHANA SAXENA..... Petitioner
..... Petitioner
ThroughMr. Medhanshu Tripathi with Mr.Sehgal & Ms. Garima Tripathi, Advs.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS ..... Respondents
ThroughMr. Ashish Negi, Adv. for Ms. RichaKapoor, ASCSI Praveen Kumar, P.S. Mandawali
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMARO R R%01.11.2017
CRL. M.A.17718/2017 (Exemption)
Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(CRL) 3030/2017 & Crl.M.A. 17717/2017 (stay)
The petitioner is aggrieved by the notice under Section 63 of theCr.P.C. whereby he has only been communicated that he is required to givereply for the offences under Sections 107/150 of the Cr.P.C. on 06.07.2017.
This court has been informed that next date before the learnedMagistrate is in the month of December.
The notice impugned, though is vague and does not contain thesubstance of information received against the petitioner but the petitioner
has appeared before the Magistrate and has now come to know the substanceof information collected against her.
In that view of the matter, there would be no necessity of interfering
with the notice.
Needless to say that the learned Magistrate while dealing with theissue shall comply with the requirements under Sections 111 and 116 of theCr.P.C. before passing final order.
No order is thus required to be passed in the present writ petition.Dismissed.
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J
NOVEMBER 01, 2017