CRL.M.C./2191/2020 of YOGENDER @ BANTY & ORS. Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. & ANR.
Parties
- Advs (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (206)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
- W.P.(C)/4939/2025 of ANIL KUMAR MISRA Vs ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (2025)
- CIVIL APPEAL 123/2023 (2025)
- W.P.(C)/756/2025 of VIKAS KUMAR AND ORS Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS (2025)
- CRL.M.C./3860/2023 of DR SACHITHA BHASKAR SHETTY Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. (2025)
- W.P.(C)/9732/2025 of SMT VEENA CHANDRA AND ORS. Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS (2025)
Cites (0 resolved of 1 detected)
1 case citation detected in this judgment's own text, but none resolved to a judgment page in this build yet.
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 11[th] November, 2020
+ CRL.M.C. 2191/2020
YOGENDER @ BANTY & ORS. .... Petitioners
Through Mr. Mani Grover and Mr.Nikunj,
Advs.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ... Respondents
Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP with
Mr.Shantanu Sharma and Mr. Dhruv
Pande, Advs.
with SI Subhash
Respondent No.2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U M N T(ORAL)
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
Crl. M.A.15586/2020
1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.C.2191/2020
3.Vide the present petition, petitioners seek direction for quashing of FIR No.315/2015 dated 07.04.2015 registered at Police Station Gokal Puri,
Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.
4.Notice issued.
5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and by respondent no.2 present in person through video conferencing and with the consent of counsel for parties, present petition is taken up for final disposal.
6.Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 18.02.2012 as per
Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 04.05.2014.
7.Petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before the Family Courts, NE, Karkardooma, Delhi vide settlement deed dated 16.10.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.
8.Complainant is present in person who has been identified by SI Subhash/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
9.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash
FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting petitioners any further.
10.For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.315/2015 dated 07.04.2015
registered at Police Station Gokal Puri, Delhi and consequent proceedings
emanating therefrom are quashed.
11.The petition is, accordingly, allowed and disposed of.
12.The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.
NOVEMBER 11, 2020/rk
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE