CRL.M.C./1476/2018 of PRAMIT NATHAN @ PRAMIT JAGANNATHAN Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+CRL.M.C. 1476/2018 & Crl. M.A. no. 5360/2018

PRAMIT NATHAN @ PRAMIT JAGANNATHAN..... PetitionerThroughMr. Anurag Jain and Mr. AyushSharma, Advs.ThroughMr. Anurag Jain and Mr. AyushSharma, Advs.

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR...... RespondentsThroughMs. Manjeet Arya, APP with SISumarjeet Kaur, P.S. G.K.-IRespondent no. 2 in personThroughMs. Manjeet Arya, APP with SISumarjeet Kaur, P.S. G.K.-IRespondent no. 2 in person

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R R%22.03.2018

It is submitted that petitioner and respondent no.2 are living in the

same locality.On the complaint of respondent no. 2, FIR No.272/2016under Sections 341/506/509/354 IPC was registered at police station GreaterKailash.With the intervention of their common friends, petitioner andrespondent no. 2 have settled their disputes amicably before the MediationCentre, Saket Courts, New Delhi on 5[th]August, 2017; therefore, theaforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom may bequashed. Respondent no. 2 is present in Court and has been identified by SI

Sumarjeet Kaur of police station G.K. – I. Respondent no. 2 admits havingsettled the matter with petitioner her own free will, voluntarily and withoutany undue force, pressure or coercion and she has no objection in case FIRis quashed.

Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioner andrespondent no. 2 voluntarily, in the interest of justice, FIR No.272/2016under Sections 341/506/509/354 IPC registered at police station GreaterKailash and the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Miscellaneous applicationis disposed of as infructuous. Dasti.

MARCH 22, 2018r.bararia

A.K. PATHAK, J.