CRL.M.C./4920/2017 of SURJEET SINGH BADHAN & ORS Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Parties
- SURJEET SINGH BADHAN & ORS (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+CRL.M.C. 4920/2017
SURJEET SINGH BADHAN & ORS..... PetitionersThroughMr. Mukesh Birla, Mr. Imran Khan,Mr. Rohitash and Mr. Mani Ram,Advs.ThroughMr. Mukesh Birla, Mr. Imran Khan,Mr. Rohitash and Mr. Mani Ram,Advs.
versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR..... RespondentsThroughDr. M.P. Singh, APP with SI Raju,PS. Govind Puri for the StateRespondent nos. 2 to 4 in personThroughDr. M.P. Singh, APP with SI Raju,PS. Govind Puri for the StateRespondent nos. 2 to 4 in person
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK
O R R%01.03.2018
It is submitted that quarrel ensued between the petitioners andrespondent nos. 2 to 4 on the issue of parking and cross FIRs wereregistered.Respondent nos.2 to 4 are present in Court and have beenidentified by SI Raju of police station Govind Puri. Respondent nos. 2 to 4submit that they have settled the matter with petitioners of their own freewill, voluntarily and without any undue force, pressure or coercion, vide aMemorandum of Understanding dated 15[th]November, 2017.Respondentnos. 2 to 4 further submit that they have no objection in case FIR is quashed.
Keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the petitioners andrespondent nos. 2 to 4, in my view, no fruitful purpose would be served tokeep the criminal proceedings pending.Accordingly, FIR No. 385/2017under Sections 323/341/506/34 IPC at Police Station Govind Puri, which isat the investigation stage, is quashed.
Petition is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.
MARCH 01, 2018r.bararia
A.K. PATHAK, J.