NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/5193/2017 of ANAND GUTPA Vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2018-07-18
Case number
5193/2017

Parties

Cited by (29)

Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.

View all 29 citing cases →

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Arguments

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5193/2017 & CM APPL. 22124/2017ANAND GUTPA ..... Petitioner ANAND GUTPA ..... Petitioner

Through Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate. versus versus

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Standing Counsel for South Delhi Municipal Corporation with Mr. Kamlesh Anand and Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advocates for R-2. Through Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Standing Counsel for South Delhi Municipal Corporation with Mr. Kamlesh Anand and Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advocates for R-2.

Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Standing Counsel for DDA. DDA.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R R11.01.2018

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition, and states that if advised the petitioner would file fresh writ petition impugning the new notification. It is also prayed that all contentions and issues may be left open.

We take the statement made by the counsel for the petitioner on record and dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

SANJIV KHANNA, J.

JANUARY 11, 2018 NC/MR

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.