BAIL APPLN./392/2018 of RAI SINGH Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2018-03-20

Parties

+ BAIL APPLN. 392/2018 RAI SINGH (PETITIONER)
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.M.C./2191/2020 of YOGENDER @ BANTY & ORS. Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. & ANR. (2020)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+BAIL APPLN. 392/2018RAI SINGHRAI SINGH

..... Petitioner

ThroughMr. Nitin Prakash and Mr. ManishSharma, Advs

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI

..... Respondent

ThroughMr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for Statewith SI Om Prakash, PS DBG Road

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAKO R R%20.03.2018

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has nocriminal record and has been falsely implicated. Nothing has been recoveredfrom the petitioner. Investigation is complete, in as much as, chargesheet hasalready been filed. Prosecution’s case is wholly based on circumstantialevidence and there is no independent evidence to connect the petitioner withthe alleged offence.

LearnedAPPsubmitsthatpetitioneralongwithco-accusedcommitted theft of 100 of spare parts of Bajaj three wheelers from shop.Certain other articles including TV and mobile phones were taken away bythe petitioner and the co-accused by hiring tempo.

Keeping in mind the totality of facts and circumstances, it is orderedthat petitioner be released on bail, subject to his furnishing personal bond

in the sum of `10,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfactionof the trial court.

Bail Application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

MARCH 20, 2018/nk

A.K. PATHAK, J