BAIL APPLN./2035/2018 of POORAN @ SUMIT Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2018-12-04

Parties

Represented by: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, Advs (PETITIONER)
STATE NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

BAIL APPLN./1456/2017 of SHAN MOHD Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI (2017)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2035/2018 POORAN @ SUMIT

..... Petitioner

Represented by: Mr. K. Singhal, Mr. Nishant Bhardwaj, Advs.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI

..... Respondent

Represented by: Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP with Insp. Sheelwant Singh PS Mundka.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R R04.12.2018

After some arguments learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition, however prays that the trial be expedited.

The petitioner has been in custody since 17[th] June, 2013 and prosecution has examined only 16 witnesses out of 55 witnesses cited. Having heard learned counsel for the parties this Court is of the considered opinion that directions to expedite the trial are required to be passed.

Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within one year from the next date of hearing before it.

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh one in case the trial is not expedited.

DECEMBER 04, 2018 ‘ga’

MUKTA GUPTA, J.