NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/1828/2018 of DR. CHANDRA RAJAN Vs GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2019-02-06
Case number
1828/2018

Parties

Cites (1)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1828/2018 & C.M.No.27355/2018

DR. CHANDRA RAJAN ..... Petitioner

Through: Ms.K.R.Chitra, Adv.

Versus

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents

Through: Mr.Anupam Srivastava, ASC with Ms.Shreya Mehta, Adv. for R-1/GNCTD. Mr.T.Singhdev, Adv. with Mr.Tarun Verma, Adv. for R-2. Ms.Shreya Mehta, Adv. for R-1/GNCTD. Mr.T.Singhdev, Adv. with Mr.Tarun Verma, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO

O R R% 29.01.2019

The petitioner, practicing advocate, has field this writ petition in

public interest and the prayer made reads as under:-

“a)Direct respondent Nos.1 & 2 to implement the policy to have the Advocates Welfare Fund Stamps of different denominations being used and affixed on Vakalatnama in Delhi under the provisions of the Advocates Welfare Funds Act 2001 given proper consecutive Serial Numbers, with immediate effect and also take all security measures to prevent forgery and printing of duplicate welfare fund stamps.”

2.It is the grievance of the petitioner that by not issuing serial numbers to the Welfare Stamps which are affixed on vakalatnamas filed in different Courts in Delhi as required under the Advocates Welfare Fund Act, 2001 and by not marking Rs.5/- and Rs.10/- stamps by different colours or marking, grave forgery and manipulation is being done and to prevent all W.P.(C) 1828/2018 Page 1 of 2.

these things, this writ petition has been filed in public interest.

3.Respondent No.1, the Department of Law, Justice and Legislative Affairs of NCT of Delhi has brought on record detailed affidavit which goes to show that the stamps are now being printed with proper serial numbers and different colours are being used for the purpose of identification of the adhesive stamps. The respondent No.2, Bar Council of Delhi has brought on –record the stamps now printed as Annexure R-3 which goes to show that the stamps are being printed in different colours. Rs.5/- Advocates Welfare Fund Stamps are printed in light blue colour and the Rs.10/- stamps are in pink colour. That apart, the affidavits do show that various steps have been taken for preventing misuse of the stamps.

4.That being so, now we see no reason to make any further indulgence into the matter even though during the course of hearing, the petitioner who appears in person vehemently tried to argue that this is not sufficient and steps should be taken for printing and circulation of the stamps in manner as is being done in various other states. We are satisfied that steps taken by the respondents are in accordance with the requirement of law and no further indulgence into the matter is called for.

5.The petition is accordingly dismissed along with the pending application.

CHIEF JUSTICE

JANUARY 29, 2019 ‘anb’W.P.(C) 1828/2018

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J

Page 2 of 2.