CRL.M.C./6193/2019 of ASIF Vs STATE & ANR
Parties
- ASIF (PETITIONER)
- STATE & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cited by (8)
Counts citations resolved within this build's own ingested judgment corpus. The true corpus-wide count will be higher until more of the corpus is ingested.
- BAIL APPLN./433/2025 of CHIDERA JACINTA OKOLI Vs CUSTOMS (2025)
- CRL.M.C./4225/2024 of NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU Vs ALEX EDITNELSON (2024)
- BAIL APPLN./2320/2019 of AMIT KUMAR SINGH Vs DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE (DRI) (2024)
- CRL.M.C./3866/2024 of NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU (DZU) Vs AQYAR KHAN SHINWARI (2024)
- CRL.M.C./3924/2024 of NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU Vs NIMATULLAH MANGAL & ANR. (2024)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 04.12.2019
+ CRL.M.C. 6193/2019
ASIF
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Shashank Vats, Adv.
versus
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for State R-2 in person
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
J U M N T (ORAL)
CRL.M.A. 41774/2019 (Exemption)
1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2.This application is, accordingly, disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 6193/2019
3.Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby –quashing FIR No. 394/2013 dated 17.10.2013 registered at Police Station
Shahdara, Delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.
4.Notice issued.
5.Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the
respondent no.2.
6.With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.
7.The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No. 2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.
8.Respondent No. 2 is personally present in Court. Original of her Aadhaar Card (bearing No. [REDACTED]) is seen and returned. She submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.
9.The petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of relative and well wishers have entered into an amicable settlement and have settled all their disputes amicably out of the Court as they belong to one locality and both have agreed to live peacefully in future.
10.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received the total settlement amount and prays that the present petition may be quashed.
11.Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.
12.For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No. 394/2013 dated –17.10.2013 registered at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.
13.The petition is allowed accordingly.
Dasti.
DECEMBER 04, 2019 PB
(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE
CRL.M.C.6193/2019