W.P.(CRL)/415/2024 of RAJJAN @ ASHU CHAUHAN Vs THE STATE
Parties
- RAJJAN @ ASHU CHAUHAN (PETITIONER)
- THE STATE (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (5)
- constitution of india, article-21 (1950)
- constitution of india, article-21 (1950)
- code of criminal procedure (1973)
- code of criminal procedure (1973)
- constitution of india (1950)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(CRL) 415/2024
RAJJAN @ ASHU CHAUHAN ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vishest Wadhwa & Ms. Swadha Gupta, Advocates. Gupta, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC (Crl.) for
the State with Ms. Anvita Bhandari,
Mr. Kunal Mittal, Mr. Arjit Sharma & Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocates. SI Mahendra, P.S. Vasant Kunj South. Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocates. SI Mahendra, P.S. Vasant Kunj South.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
O R R18.03.2024
1. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeks the following prayers:
“i). issue Writ of certiorari, Mandamus or any other writ, order or directions thereby calling the records of the entire proceedings from the office of Deputy Commissioner of Police-1, Vasant Kunj South, New Delhi, in the titled of State versus Rajjan @ Ashu Chauhan vide File no.19/2022, under section 47 of DP Act, with Police Station Vasant Kunj South;
ii). issue Writ of certiorari, Mandamus or any other writ, order or directions in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondent thereby setting aside/quashing of the order dated 30.01.2024 passed by the office of Deputy Commissioner of Police-1, Vasant Kunj South, New Delhi, in the titled of State versus Rajjan @ Ashu Chauhan vide
File no.19/2022, under section 47 of DP Act, with Police Station Vasant Kunj South, in the interest of justice.
Any other order/ s, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the applicant/petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition on the ground that the present petitioner has already availed his statutory remedy before the Hon’ble Lieutenant Governor.
3. Leave granted.
4. The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.
5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
MARCH 18, 2024/bsr
AMIT SHARMA, J