CRL.M.C./4891/2022 of VARUN WALIA Vs STATE OF NCT AND ANR.
Parties
- > picture [34 x 35] intentionally omitted <== (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT AND ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 7 detected)
Statutes cited (3)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
$~39 & 75
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI(39)+ CRL.M.C. 4891/2022 VARUN WALIA ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Asheesh Raizada, Mr.Tajendra Rajawat, Mr.Nand Kishore, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT AND ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr.Aman Usman, APP with SI Vinod Nain.
Mr.Mohd. Ali, Mr.Chhatresh Kr. Sahu, Mr.Kunal Chaudhary, Mr.Manoj Goswami, Mr.Hakim Khan, Advs. for R-2.
(75) CRL.M.C. 9227/2023 KRITI SHARMA
..... Petitioner Mr.Mohd. Ali, Mr.Chhatresh Kr. Sahu, Mr.Kunal Chaudhary, Mr.Manoj Goswami, Mr.Hakim
Through:
Khan, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
..... Respondents Mr.Aman Usman, APP with SI Vinod Nain. Mr.Asheesh Raizada,
Through:
Mr.Tajendra Rajawat, Mr.Nand Kishore, Advs. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
O R R24.01.2024
1.These petitions have been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking quashing of the cross FIRs, that are, FIR No.70/2019 registered at Police Station: Sarai Rohilla, New Delhi under Section 498A/406/34 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860 (in short, ‘IPC’) and FIR No.330/2019 registered at Police Station: Sarai Rohilla, New Delhi under Section 420/34 of the IPC along with all other proceedings arising therefrom.
2.The learned counsels for the parties submit that the parties have resolved their inter se disputes amicably and have entered into Settlement Deed dated 04.12.2021 before the Mediation Centre, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
3.The complainants are personally present in Court and have been duly identified by the Investigating Officer.
4.Considering the above settlement between the parties and in view of the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, Parbathai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinh Karmur & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors., (2017) 9 SCC 641 and State of Haryana & Ors. v. Bhajan Lal & Ors.1992 Supp (1) SCC 335, I find that no useful purpose would be served in continuing with the criminal proceedings and it would be an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer.
5.Accordingly, the FIR No.70/2019 registered at Police Station: Sarai Rohilla, New Delhi under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and FIR No.330/2019 registered at Police Station: Sarai Rohilla, New Delhi under Section 420/34 of the IPC along with all other proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed.
6.The petitions are disposed of in the above terms.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
JANUARY 24, 2024/Arya/am
Click here to check corrigendum, if any