CRL.M.C./8004/2024 of MANYAA CHANDOK Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
Parties
- > picture [34 x 35] intentionally omitted <== (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 8004/2024, CRL.M.As. 30550-51/2024 MANYAA CHANDOK
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sidhant Kumar, Mr. Shivankar Rao, Mr. Saurabh Tyagi, Mr. Tanishq Sharma, Advs. Rao, Mr. Saurabh Tyagi, Mr. Tanishq Sharma, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Sunil, ASI Krishanpal, PS South Campus
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMAO R R09.10.2024
After some submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to raise all contentions before the learned Trial Court. Counsel further submits that the applications of the other co-accused persons should be decided on their own merits, without being influenced by the bail order or the present petition.
It goes without saying that each bail application must be decided independently, based on the facts and circumstances of the individual accused, and should not be influenced by the bail orders of others. This Court expects the learned Trial Court to follow the same procedure.
Accordingly, the present petition, along with all pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
OCTOBER 9, 2024/Pallavi/SM
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J