CRL.M.C./9602/2024 of SATPAL NAGPAL & ANR. Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2024-12-06
Case number: 9602/2024

Parties

SATPAL NAGPAL & ANR (PETITIONER)
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.M.C./2191/2020 of YOGENDER @ BANTY & ORS. Vs THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. & ANR. (2020)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Header

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+CRL.M.C. 9602/2024 & CRL.M.A. 36839/2024

SATPAL NAGPAL & ANR......PetitionersThrough:Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rupendra Pratap Singh, Mr. SammarVatts and Ms. Sakshi Mendiratta,Advs.Through:Mr. Puneet Mittal, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rupendra Pratap Singh, Mr. SammarVatts and Ms. Sakshi Mendiratta,Advs.

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR......RespondentsThrough:Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for Statewith Insp. Bharat Bhushan, PS EOW.Mr. R.S. Sahni, Adv. for R-2.Through:Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for Statewith Insp. Bharat Bhushan, PS EOW.Mr. R.S. Sahni, Adv. for R-2.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R R06.12.2024

CRL.M.A. 36840/2024

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.Application stands disposed of.Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 9602/2024 & CRL.M.A. 36839/2024

1.This is petition seeking setting aside/quashing of order dated27.11.2024 passed by learned ASJ-09, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi inBail Application No. 1004/2024 to the extent that the petitioners have beendirected to appear in person before the Court on 09.12.2024.

2.Mr. Mittal, learned Senior Counsel has drawn my attention to theorder-sheets from 06.06.2024 onwards wherein it is the learned counsel forthe respondent who has been taking adjournments on one pretext or the

other and the application for cancellation of bail has not been heard onmerits. The learned Senior Counsel states that the petitioners have noobjection in arguing but the personal presence of the petitioners may beexempted.

3.Issue Notice. Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP accepts notice for the State.Mr. Sahni, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent No. 2.

4.Mr. Sahni, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 states that he has noobjection if the petitioners are exempted from physical appearance on thenext date of hearing as long as the application/petition for cancellation ofbail is argued on merits.

5.Hence, the order dated 27.11.2024 is modified and it is directed thatthe petitioners herein need not appear in person on the date of arguments on09.12.2024 for hearing of the application for cancellation of bail, however,this Court has not interdicted the hearing of arguments by the learned ASJ-09 on the said date.

6.The petition is disposed of.

7.Dasti.

DECEMBER 6, 2024/akc

JASMEET SINGH, J

Click here to check corrigendum, if any