NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph โ€” Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

BAIL APPLN./4146/2023 of MANISH Vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2024-07-04

Parties

Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

$~4 & 6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4146/2023 MANISH .....Petitioner MANISH .....Petitioner

Through: Ms. Swati Rathi, Ms. Chetishtha Malik, Mr. Prem Sood and Mr. Luv, Advs. Malik, Mr. Prem Sood and Mr. Luv, Advs.

versus

THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent

Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Mr. Ankit Vishnoi, Mr. K K Sharma, Mr. Vishek Vats, Mr, Nitin, Ms. Sapna & Mr. Chaaitanya Jain, Advocates. State with Mr. Ankit Vishnoi, Mr. K K Sharma, Mr. Vishek Vats, Mr, Nitin, Ms. Sapna & Mr. Chaaitanya Jain, Advocates.

Mr. Gajraj Singh, Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Ms. Ritika Rajput, Advs. for complainant Sachdeva, Ms. Ritika Rajput, Advs. for complainant

+ BAIL APPLN. 362/2024

NITESH DAHIYA .....Petitioner

Through: Ms. Swati Rathi, Ms. Chetishtha Malik, Mr. Prem Sood and Mr. Luv, Advs. Malik, Mr. Prem Sood and Mr. Luv, Advs.

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Mr. Ankit Vishnoi, Mr. K K Sharma, Mr. Vishek Vats, Mr, Nitin, Ms. Sapna & Mr. Chaaitanya Jain, Advocates. Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Mr. Ankit Vishnoi, Mr. K K Sharma, Mr. Vishek Vats, Mr, Nitin, Ms. Sapna & Mr. Chaaitanya Jain, Advocates.

Mr. Gajraj Singh, Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Ms. Ritika Rajput, Advs. for complainant Sachdeva, Ms. Ritika Rajput, Advs. for complainant

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R R% 04.07.2024

1.Counsel for the petitioners in these petitions, after some arguments,

on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw these petitions.

2.Both these above captioned petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn.

3.Pending applications, if any, are disposed of as infructuous.

4.Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

JULY 4, 2024/sm

ANISH DAYAL, J