NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

CRL.L.P./127/2019 of SUSHILA DEVI Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2025-07-25
Case number
12878 of 2017

Parties

Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)

Statutes cited (2)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.L.P. 127/2019

SUSHILA DEVI

.....Petitioner

Through: Appearance not given. versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondent

Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAO R R25.07.2025

1. The present Criminal Leave Petition under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, against the impugned Judgment dated 27.07.2018 of learned MM, South District, Saket Courts, Delhi in CC No. 12878/2017 vide which the Respondent has been acquitted in the Complaint under Section 138 of N.I. Act.

2. In view of the Judgment of Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran,2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 and Order of this Court in Crl.L.P.215/2021 dated 23.07.2025, the present matter is disposed of with direction that the present Petition be treated as an Appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Cr.P.C and numbered accordingly.

3. In case there is Application pending for Condonation of Delay, the same be also transferred along with the entire record to be considered by the learned ASJ in accordance with law.

4. The Registry is directed to transfer entire record of the case including

the requisitioned copy of TCR, to the Learned Principal District & Sessions

Judge, South District, Saket Courts, New Delhi for marking it to the concerned Appellate Court/ learned ASJ, on 20.08.2025.

5. The parties are directed to appear before the concerned learned Principal District & Sessions Judge on 20.08.2025.

6. It is hereby, clarified that there are no observations as to the merits of the case. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open to be agitated before the Court concerned.

7. pending Application(s), if any.

In view of the above, the present Appeal is disposed of along with the

JULY 25, 2025/va

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J