CRL.M.C./4889/2025 of DINESH GUPTA Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Parties
- DINESH GUPTA (PETITIONER)
- STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1)
Statutes cited (1)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 4889/2025
DINESH GUPTA
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Mr. Sunanda Tulysan, Mr. Sanjay Bansal and Ms. Shweta Pattnaik, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP
.....Respondents
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R R% 24.07.2025
CRL.M.A. 21191/2025 EXEMPTION
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 4889/2025 & CRL.M.A. 21190/2025 INTERIM RELIEF
1.This is petition under Section 528 of BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No. 126/2013 under Section 465/467/471 IPC registered at P.S.Hazrat Nizamuddin, South East District as also the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.
2.Learned APP states that chargesheet has already been filed in the case and the matter is listed for charge before the trial court, and therefore, the petitioner may reserve his arguments to be addressed at the stage of charge before the trial court.
3.After part submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to place all the submissions before the trial court at the stage of charge. He further prays that petitioner may be allowed to appear before the trial court through video-conferencing.
4.The statement made by learned counsel is taken on record and the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. All rights and contentions of the parties are kept reserved. Petitioner is at liberty to appear through video-conferencing before the trial court at the stage of arguments on charge.
JULY 24, 2025/ib
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J