NyayAI Legal Knowledge Graph — Public Judgment & Act Pages (validation build, unlisted)

W.P.(C)/77/2019 of MINA KUMARI Vs GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

Court
Delhi High Court
Decision date
2025-01-08
Bench
CONNECTED MATTERS KUMARSIGNING
Case number
56/2019

Parties

Cites (1 resolved of 3 detected)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

$~64 & 65

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 56/2019

DINESH .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Ms. Saloni Mahajan and Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Advs.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel GNCTD with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.

+ W.P.(C) 77/2019 & CM APPL. 450/2019

MINA KUMARI .....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Ms. Saloni Mahajan and Mr. Rishabh Kumar, Advs.

versus

GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND

ORS. .....Respondents

Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel GNCTD with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs. Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Khwaja Umair, Advs. For R-4, 5 & 6

Signature Not Verified

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL

JUDGMENT (ORAL)08.01.2025

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1.These original applications were disposed of with the following observations:-

“17. In the conspectus, we do not find any necessity to keep these O.As. pending. We dispose them of at this stage by granting liberty to the applicants to seek reconsideration of these O.As. after the disposal of the W.P. (C) No.5179/2018 - Durga Parshad (supra) by the Hon'ble High Court. No order as to costs.”

2.Instead of remanding the matters to the Tribunal, we have decided WP (C) 5179/2018, Government of NCT of Delhi v Durga Parshad in favour of the respondents, the petitioners, in these petitions before this court would be entitled to the same relief. Their OAs are, therefore, allowed to the same extent.

3.These writ petitions are disposed of.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

JANUARY 8, 2025/AS

AJAY DIGPAUL, J.

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Signature Not Verified