W.P.(CRL)/3430/2018 of R K ARORA Vs THE STATE ( NCT ) OF DELHI & ANR — W.P.(CRL)/3430/2018 of R K ARORA Vs THE STATE ( NCT ) OF DELHI & ANR

Parties

+W.P.(CRL) 2251/2018, CRL.M.A. 28728/2018SUPERTECH LTD (PETITIONER)
THE STATE (NCT)OF DELHI & ANR (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

W.P.(C)/5193/2017 of ANAND GUTPA Vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. (2018)

Statutes cited (3)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

$~24 & 25

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+W.P.(CRL) 2251/2018, CRL.M.A. 28728/2018SUPERTECH LTD

.....Petitioner

Through:None.

versus

THE STATE (NCT)OF DELHI & ANR

.....Respondent

Through:Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Ld. ASC forthe State with Insp. Karmveer SinghP.S. Kakaji.

+W.P.(CRL) 3430/2018, CRL.M.A. 35895/2018R K ARORA

.....Petitioner

Through:None.

versus

THE STATE ( NCT ) OF DELHI & ANR

.....RespondentThrough:Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, Ld. ASC forthe State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R R%14.01.2025

1.The two Writ Petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C read with Article226 of the Constitution of Indiahave been filed for quashing of FIRNo.66/2018 under Section 420/34 IPC.2.It has been recorded in the Order dated 28.05.2024 on behalf of the

Petitioner that the Resolution Professional in respect of the Company hasbeen appointed. Though none had appeared on behalf of the Petitioner R.K.Arora, Mr. Vikas Sethi, Advocate on behalf of Supertech Ltd. had appearedon the last date of hearing.

3.None has appeared on behalf of the Petitioners today. It is already

3:30 P.M.

4.Petitions are dismissed in default.

JANUARY 14, 2025/va

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J