W.P.(C)/8981/2022 of RAKESH BABBAR Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
Parties
- W.P.(C)/8981/2022 of RAKESH BABBAR (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. (RESPONDENT)
Cites (1 resolved of 2 detected)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
$~31 & 32
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8930/2022 & CM Appl. 26844/2022RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sakshi Mehley, Mr. Sajal Manchanda, Ms. Akansha Vidyarthi and Mr. Saurabh Singh Chauhan, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Ms. Chandrika Sachdev and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advs. for R-1.
(32) + W.P.(C) 8981/2022 & CM Appl. 26999/2022+ W.P.(C) 8981/2022 & CM Appl. 26999/2022
RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sakshi Mehley, Mr. Sajal Manchanda, Ms. Akansha Vidyarthi and Mr. Saurabh Singh Chauhan, Advs.
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Ms. Chandrika Sachdev and Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advs. for R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
O R R22.08.2025
% 22.08.20251. The grievance of the Petitioner is that although the Impugned Award
dated 26.11.2018 has been passed against company, M/s Rachna Electricals (P) Ltd. [hereinafter referred to as “Company”], summons are being issued by the learned Executing Court to him as he is one of the ex-directors of the Company.
2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that he seeks to rely upon
the order dated 17.01.2019 passed by the learned Executing Court.
3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner was not given an opportunity to present his case since he was not party in the proceedings before the learned Labour Court which were filed by the Respondent against the Company. However, the summons are being sent to him as if he is an individual employer.
4. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that
he restricts his prayer in the present Petitions to an opportunity to place on record the true and corrects facts before the learned Executing Court.
5. None appears for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 despite service. Learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 submits that he has no objection to the same.
6. Accordingly, restricting the prayer in the present Petitions, the Petitioner is permitted to take all appropriate remedies in accordance with law before the learned Executing Court.
7. Applications also stand closed. Applications also stand closed.
The Petitions are disposed of in the aforegoing terms. All pending
The parties will act based on the digitally signed copy of the order.
AUGUST 22, 2025/r/pa
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J