BAIL APPLN./1417/2025 of CHANDER MOHAN GILHOTRA Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Court: Delhi High Court
Decision date: 2025-04-15

Parties

CHANDER MOHAN GILHOTRA (PETITIONER)
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)

Cites (1)

CRL.M.C./9141/2023 of ANURAG TANHA Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. (2025)

Full text

solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus

Show all Body

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1417/2025

CHANDER MOHAN GILHOTRA

.....Petitioner

Through: Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, Ms. Poonam Sharma and Mr. Kunal Tyagi, Advs.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

.....Respondent

Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with SI Krishan Kumar, P.S. Bawana.

CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

O R R% 15.04.2025CRL.M.A. 11060/2025 (Exemption)

2.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

3.Application stands disposed of.

BAIL APPLN. 1417/2025

4.The present first bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ("BNSS") has been filed by the petitioner seeking grant of Anticipatory Bail in Complaint No. 280/SHO Bawana, dated 20.03.2025 registered at Police Station Bawana, New Delhi.

5.Mr. Himanshu Tyagi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though he has filed the present application seeking anticipatory

bail but till date no FIR has been registered against him, therefore, he limits his relief only to the extent that he should be given statutory notice, as per law.

6.Mr. Raghuinder Verma, the learned APP appearing for the State, also concedes to the above submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

7.In view of the submissions made, statutory notice, as per law, be given to the petitioner, at least three days in advance, after the registration of FIR, in the present case.

8.Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

SHALINDER KAUR, J

APRIL 15, 2025/sds/kp

Click here to check corrigendum, if any