AMOL SINGH versus STATE OF M.P.

[2008] 8 S.C.R. 956

AMOL SINGH v. STATE OF M.P.

(Criminal Appeal No. 898 Of 2008)

MAY 15, 2008

(DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT AND P.SATHASIVAM, JJ.)

Penal Code, 1860-s.302 r!w s.34- Murder- Two dying declarations -Inconsistency between, in respect of the mo-c five and manner of murder- Conviction by Courts below - On appeal, held: Even if there is plurality in dying declarations, if it is voluntary, reliable and made in fit mental condition and consistent, can be relied upon without any corroboration -In case of inconsistency nature thereof has to be examined -In the instant case, the inconsistencies are material - Hence, conviction not called for -- Dying Declaration.

Appellant-accused alongwith another accused was charged for having caused death of woman. The de-E [ceased had made her dying declaration before ][ASl(PWS). ]Thereafter, she again made her dying declaration before the Executive Magistrate(PW9). Trial Court convicted both the accused uls.302 rlw s.34 IPC. High Court confirmed the conviction holding that though there were more than one dying declaration, the extent of variance between the two was insignificant. Hence the present appeal.

Allowing the appeal, the Court

HELD: 1. It is not the plurality of the dying declara-tions but the reliability thereof that adds weight to the pros-G ecution case. If dying declaration is found to be volun-tary, reliable and made in fit mental condition, it can be relied upon without any corroboration. The statement should be consistent throughout. If the deceased had several opportunities of making such dying declarations,

Ii" ., .., ..

that is to say, if there are more than one dying declaration

they should be consistent. However, if some inconsisten-cies are noticed between one dying declaration and the other, the court has to examine the nature of the incon-sistencies, namely, whether they are material or not. While scruitinizing the contents of various dying declaration, in such situation, the court has to examine the same in the light of the various surrounding facts and circumstances . [Para 8] [960-D,E,F]

Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam v. State of A.P 1993 (2)

sec 684 - referred to.

2. The High Court had observed that the dying dee-

laration (Exh.P11) scribed by the Executive Officer, (PW9) was not in conformity with the FIR and the earlier dying declaration (Exh.P3) scribed by ASI (PW 8) in so far as different motives have been described. Several other discrepancie exist even as regards the manner in which she is supposed to have been sprinkled with kerosene and thereafter set on fire. Therefore, the discrepancies, make the last declaration doubtful. The nature of the in-consistencies is such that there are certainly material. That [E ]being so, it would be unsafe to convict the appellant [Paras 9 and 10] [960-G,H, 961-A,8]

CRIMINALAPPELLATEJURISDICTION: CriminalAppeal

No. 898 of 2008

From the Judgment and Order dated 18.06.2007 of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Criminal Appeal No. 399/1993

Shiv SagarTiwari, R.R. Singh,Akanksha Tiwari and Pooja for the Appellant.

Siddhartha Dave, Vibha Datta Makhija and Jemtiben for the Respondent.

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

DR ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. Leave granted.

2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of the Divi-sion Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur up-holding the conviction and sentence of the appellant for the of-fence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the 'IPC') and sentence of imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.2,000/-with default stipu-lation. AppellantAmol Singh was arraigned in the charge sheet asA2.

3. Prosecution version as unfolded during trial is as follows:

Saraswati Bai-deceased was woman of questionable character. After being deserted by her husband Motilal, she developed illicit relationship with A2 who ultimately kept her as mistress. At the relevant point of time, she was residing in Tapariya (hut) at village Bichhua.

On 17[1]h March, 1992 at about 8.00 p.m. hearing screams of Saraswati Bai, persons residing in the neighbourhood viz. Rajesh Gupta (PW6), Santosh Gudda (PW2), Mukundi Lal (PW4), Kaliram (PW5), Chhindami Lal (PW3), and Chandra Bhushan rushed towards her hut. In the transit, some of them had seen 1 running away. They found Saraswati Bai lying in severely burnt condition in the courtyard of the hut. On being enquired, she revealed that both the appellants had sprinkled kerosene over her body and set her ablaze. According to her, A2 was enraged by her act of taking land belonging to his ad-versary Raju Seth for cultivation as Bataidar (crop-sharer) . .

It was upon the report (Ex. P-1) lodged by Kotwar Prahlad Singh (PW1) and ASI Bairam (PW8) registered case under Section 307 read with Section 34 IPC against the appellants. He along with Prahlad. proceeded to the spot and recorded Saraswati's dying declaration (Ex.P-3) in the presence of Chhidami Lal (PW3), Kaliram (PW5), Babulal and Chandra Bhushan.

Saraswati Bai was immediately taken to the Government

')o.:_ .,

[DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.]

Hospital at Gadarwara. Observing that her condition was seri-A ous, Dr. B.P. Gupta (PW11) not only admitted her for treatment but also sent memo (Ex.P-13) to the SHO requiring him to take necessary action to get dying declaration recorded. Naib · Tahsildar and Executive Magistrate R.K. Dimole (PW9), after obtaining necessary certificate as to fit state of her mind, re-B corded Saraswati Bai's dying declaration between 4.35 a.m. and 4.50 a.m. thereafter, at 9.10 a.m., Saraswati Bai breathed . her last in the hospital. Accordingly, the case was altered to one under Section 302 IPC.

After inquest proceedings, dead body of Saraswati Bai [c ]

was sent for post-mortem, Dr. D.S. Choudhary (PW7) found that body of Saraswati Bai, who was carrying more than 3 months pregnancy, had burnt to the extent of 89%. According to him, the cause ofSaraswati Bai's death was shock due to extensive burns. However, he preserved the remaining pieces of burnt saree and blouse, earrings, nathni, Bangles and bunch of scalp hair for forensic examination.

During investigation, burnt pieces of saree and blouse,

one kupiya (Container) of kerosene, matchbox, one pair of shoes belonging to A2, lathi and broken mala (necklace) were seized from the spot; the appellants were apprehended and burn injury was also found by Dr. R.K Patel (PW10) on the right forearm of A2.

4. Two accused persons faced trial for offence punishable

under Section 302 IPC and in alternative under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, as they abjured the guilt. To prove the accusations prosecution examined 11 witnesses. On con-sideration of the evidence, the trial court found the accused per-sons guilty of death of the deceased in furtherance of their com-mon intention. Accordingly, they were convicted and sentenced as aforestated. Both of them preferred separate appeals be-fore the High Court.

5. Before the High Court primary stand was to the accept-ability of the dying declaration. The High Court rejected the

plea and held that though there were more than one dying dee-laration, the extent of variance between the two was insignifi-cant. It was noted that the dying declarations were consistent in substance as to the complexity of the accused persons caus-ing burn injury to the person of the deceased and, therefore, [there ][was ][no ][infirmity ][in ][the judgment of ][the ][trial court to warrant ]interference. Accordingly the appeals were dismissed.

6. In support of the appeal learned counsel for the appel-

!ant submitted that there was great variance in the so called dying declarations, which affected credibility of the evidence.

dying declarations, which affected credibility of the evidence. 7. Learned counsel for the the respondent-State on the other on the other the other hand submitted that minor variance in the dying declarations have no relevance.

7. Learned counsel for the the respondent-State on the other on the other the other

8. Law relating to appreciation of evidence in the form of

more than one dying declaration is well settled. Accordingly, it is not the plurality of the dying declarations but the reliability thereof that adds weight to the prosecution case. If dying dee-laration is found to be voluntary, reliable and made in fit mental condition, it can be relied upon without any corroboration. The [statement should ][be ][consistent throughout. If the deceased had ]several opportunities of making such dying declarations, that is to say, if there are more than one dying declaration they should be consistent. (See: Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam v: State of A.P [ (1993) 2 SCC 684]. However, if some inconsistencies [are noticed between ][one ][dying declaration ][and ][the other, the ]court has to examine the nature of the inconsistencies, namely, whether they are material or not. While scruitinizing the con-tents of various dying declaration, in such situation, the court has to examine the same in the light of the various surrounding

[facts ][and ][circumstances. ]

9. It is to be noted that the High Court had itself observed

that the dying declaration (Exh .P 11) scribed by the Executive Officer, (PW9) at about 0435 hours in the same night was not in conformity with the FIR and the earlier dying declaration (Exh.P3)

[scribed ][by ][ASI ][Bairam (PW ][8) ][in ][so ][far ][as ][different motives ]

have been described. That is not the only variation. Several

other discrepancies, even as regards the manner in which she is supposed to have been sprinkled with kerosene and thereaf-ter set on fire.

10. Therefore, the discrepancies, make the last declara-tion doubtful. The nature of the inconsistencies is such that there are certainly material. That being so, it would be unsafe to con-vict the appellant. The conviction is set aside and appellant is acquitted of the charges. He be set at liberty forthwith unless required to be in custody in connection with any 'other case.

Appeal allowed.