WPCRL/1197/2022 of NAGABHUSHAN S G Vs STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
Parties
- WPCRL/1197/2022 of NAGABHUSHAN S G (PETITIONER)
- STATE OF UTTARAKHAND (RESPONDENT)
Cites (2 resolved of 4 detected)
- NEEHARIKA INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS (2021)
- AIR 1960 SC 866 (1960) NOT_FOLLOWED
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
further argued that similar case was initiated at Banglore, in which, he was directed to be released on bail by the Court. Learned Deputy Advocate General, on the other hand would submit that the present petitioner is Director of the Company which has indulged in the activity of cyber crime as alleged in the FIR. In that view of the matter, we are of the opinion that in this case at this stage the Court cannot come to prima facieconclusion that no case is made out against the petitioner under the offences alleged above, and therefore in these circumstances, there is no reason to quash the FIR. We are not satisfied about the fulfilling of the condition required for quashing of the FIR as enunciated in the cases of State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp(1) SCC 335; R.P.Kapur vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866; and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC online SC 315. Hence, the WP (Crl) is dismissed being devoid of merit. (S.K.Mishra, J.) 06.07.2022Kaushal
06.07.2022