CIVIL APPEAL 6928/2025
Parties
- MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL (PETITIONER)
- STATE NCT OF DELHI (RESPONDENT)
Cites (2 resolved of 4 detected)
Full text
solid underline = linked page · dashed underline = case is in our corpus, page not published yet · dotted red = recognized reference, not in our corpus
$~8 to 16
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 6928/2025
MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Ishan Srivastava and Ms. Shagun Gupta, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.
+ CRL.M.C. 6929/2025
MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Ishan Srivastava and Ms. Shagun Gupta, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.
CRL.M.C. 6930/2025
MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Ishan Srivastava and Ms. Shagun Gupta, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.
CRL.M.C. 6931/2025
MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Ishan Srivastava and Ms. Shagun Gupta, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.
+ CRL.M.C. 6932/2025
MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Ishan Srivastava and Ms. Shagun Gupta, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.
+ CRL.M.C. 6933/2025
MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Ishan Srivastava and Ms. Shagun Gupta, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.
+ CRL.M.C. 6934/2025
MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Ishan Srivastava and Ms. Shagun Gupta, Advs.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.
CRL.M.C. 6937/2025
MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Ishan Srivastava and Ms. Shagun Gupta, Advs.
versus
STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.
+ CRL.M.C. 6940/2025
MR. HANSRAJ BANSAL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Bharat Gupta, Mr. Varun Tyagi, Mr. Ishan Srivastava and Ms. Shagun Gupta, Advs.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for State.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
O R R08.10.2025
CRL.M.A. 29106/2025 in CRL.M.C. 6928/2025CRL.M.A. 29110/2025 in CRL.M.C. 6929/2025CRL.M.A. 29113/2025 in CRL.M.C. 6930/2025CRL.M.A. 29117/2025 in CRL.M.C. 6931/2025CRL.M.A. 29124/2025 in CRL.M.C. 6932/2025CRL.M.A. 29131/2025 in CRL.M.C. 6933/2025CRL.M.A. 29135/2025 in CRL.M.C. 6934/2025CRL.M.A. 29143/2025 in CRL.M.C. 6937/2025CRL.M.A. 29148/2025 in CRL.M.C. 6940/2025
1.Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2.The applications stand disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6928-6934/2025 & CRL.M.C. 6937/2025 & CRL.M.C.6940/20252.The applications stand disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6928-6934/2025 & CRL.M.C. 6937/2025 & CRL.M.C.6940/2025
3.Through the present petitions, the petitioner seeks setting aside the order dated 30.07.2025 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Class-01, North East, Karkardooma Courts, in Complaint Cases bearing CT nos. 265/2013, 464/2013, 298/2013, 401/2013, 227/2013, 948/2013, 346/2013, 269/2013 and 725/2013 and seeks directions for tracing out and/or for reconstruction of the judicial file of the case and revival of the proceedings of the case.
4.As per the information received from Registry, the e-record is available.
5.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall recover the
same.
6.Therefore, impugned order dated 30.07.2025 whereby the learned JMFC disposed of the matter due to non-traceability of records is quashed and set aside in its entirety.
7.As to the matter in CRL.M.C. 6940/2025, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he intends to reconstruct the record and seeks liberty to do so.
8.Liberty to reconstruct the necessary records is granted.
9.The learned Trial Court concerned is directed to proceed expeditiously with the trial, considering the delay caused due to records being untraceable. expeditiously with the trial, considering the delay caused due to records being untraceable.
10.The present batch of petitions are allowed on the aforesaid terms and disposed of accordingly along with pending application (s), if any.
OCTOBER 8, 2025 gs/dd
AJAY DIGPAUL, J